Torah abuse

If there exists Jews willing to join the national-occupationists trend and go so far as to make ‘a greater Israel’…..the essential element of their faith, a religious commandment, well then, these people have become the heirs of worshippers of the golden calf who also proclaimed: “Behold your God, O Israel.” The golden calf need not be made of gold. It may also be called “nation”,“land”, “State.”

Yeshayahu Leibowitz 1968

Anshel Pfeffer’s  public evisceration (below) of far right Knesset member Smotrich’s abuse of Torah simply highlights the ignorant usage of holy words to justify rampant injustice. Several Christian exegetes have done similar work  on the false doctrine of Christian Zionism  As Kairos Palestine wrote on its 9th anniversary: We call out Christian groups who openly support Israel in its colonial policies and continuous occupation, and who use the Bible to give it theological justification.

Pfeffer abridged

Bezalel Smotrich peppered his short eight-minute speech June 9  with quotes from the Bible, the Talmud and the Midrash. He didn’t look down at his notes. He’s a ben Torah, fluent in the canonical texts. And yet at the same time so ignorant.

Yes, he said, “We want the Justice Ministry, because we want to return our judges as of old… We want to return the law of the Torah to its place.” Smotrich promised to return Israel to the glory days of King David. He may as well have promised his ecstatic audience to resurrect King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table.

It’s incredible, but a man who has spent so many years of his life in yeshivas still thinks that the Jewish people in all its iterations, including the ancient kingdoms of the House of David, ever managed their affairs according to the “law of the Torah.”

Yes, there are in the Torah and Talmud detailed chapters on jurisprudence, the laws of evidence and the lines on which a Jewish court system should be run. But not only is there little, if any, evidence of periods when Jewish nations or communities were ruled by such judiciaries, but all the evidence from just about every period points to the Jewish leaders, kings, prophets, judges, high priests, exilarchs, and yes, also the rabbis, ruling according to their political circumstances.

Jewish society, whether in the ancient homeland kingdoms or in exile, was always characterized, as it is today, by tension between state and religion. The highest accolade the Tanakh ever gives a king is that he “did what was right in the eyes of God.” Not that he subjected himself to judges ruling by the laws of the Torah.

Yes, religious Jews pray three times a day to God “to return our judges as of old,” as Smotrich pointed out on Twitter. But it’s a utopian vision that ends with the words: “and rule over us God, on your own, in grace and mercy.” Smotrich also insisted in subsequent interviews and on social media that he meant the rules of the Torah “adapted for 2019.” Surely he had no intention to stone homosexuals to death. But then who gets to decide how to adapt the Torah for our times?

Xenophobia, racism and any other form of oppression of minorities

When far-right politicians like Smotrich invoke the “laws of the Torah,” or in other countries, “Judeo-Christian” or “traditional family values” or just about any other allusion to a purer mythological past, they are always doing so we won’t call them out for their xenophobia, racism, misogyny, homophobia and any other form of oppression of minorities by the moral majority. It’s pure deflection.

And it allows other politicians to deflect as well. Just as Benjamin Netanyahu did when he tried to distance himself from his political ally Smotrich with a one-sentence statement – “The state of Israel will not be a state of halakha (rabbinical law).” Of course Netanyahu doesn’t want to denounce Smotrich’s racism and his insistence that Israel continue ruling another people. 

There is no such thing as a state run by rabbinical law, there never was and rabbinical law doesn’t have the tools to run a state anyway. It didn’t have them 2000 years ago when Jews were still sovereign in this land and the Pharisees, whose interpretation of the Torah serves as the basis for today’s halakha, were just one of a number of competing brands of Judaism.

Israel’s limited and fragile democracy is not threatened by a state run on Biblical law. The religious Zionist community that Smotrich represents is at most five percent of Israel’s population, probably less. The larger national-religious community doesn’t want Israel to be a theocracy, and the ultra-Orthodox perhaps do – but they are waiting for the Messiah to come and establish it.

What does threaten Israeli democracy is racism, occupation, corruption and resentment of the system, of which Smotrich is just one of many proponents. The way to confront him is not to buy his claim of representing Torah and Judaism.

His is a narrow and very selective interpretation of Jewish law and ethics anyway. As by necessity, any modern interpretation is. After all, just 16 verses before the Torah’s commandment against homosexuality is the one commanding us to love the stranger in our land for we were strangers in Egypt.

As we celebrate Shavuot, the festival of the giving of the Torah, this weekend, we would do well to remember that Smotrich and his ilk have constructed a Torah that fits their nationalist-supremacist purpose.